Question 1: Compare and Contrast
Finding happiness, peace and success is an individual task. However, when it comes to the state of our society, as a whole, the responsibility mentally shifts to our leaders. Are their policies protecting us? Are their actions ensuring our success? Naturally, people look towards leaders as examples to society. A leader is expected to be “a speaker of words and doer of deeds,” (Homer 9.455). This motto is essential as strong leadership and reliable government give individuals a sense of security and trust in the government which builds confidence and pride in the people. Interwoven with these principles, actions of leaders reflect the culture and attitude of the people. Societies and governments throughout the ages have struggled with the balance and regulation of society. Both in Greece and the Americas kings in ancient times bore many responsibilities that were not always fulfilled by a qualified individual. The cycle of kingship came to an end by the increasing division of responsibility among all in hope of a more stable and flourishing society.

Kings needed to be involved in social, political, religious and economic issues in order to build confidence in their reign. When a king is involved in these areas they demonstrate that they are responsible. Being responsible, in addition to being involved, builds public trust and support. Some of these responsibilities include the protection of the people, enforcement and creation of laws, and public safety and health. In the case of King Oedipus, these responsibilities are laid at his feet.. Oedipus demonstrated his responsibility to his people through his reaction to the plague. The health of his people was a concern for Oedipus. When contemplating the plague, he took it upon himself to discover the solution asking “what should I do to save this city” (Oedipus Rex line 77). Obviously, Oedipus felt responsible not only for the law and government but for the health of his people. The responsibilities of a king extended to all edges of society and parts of his subjects’ life. Thus, leading the king to become an example in all attributes.

When a king is active in the affairs of his people certain traits and attributes make him more popular in the eyes of his subjects. These virtues included “love of his subjects…beneficence…justice, self-control, wisdom, foresight, courage.” (Murray). Owing to this kind of behavior, a king or tyrant could gain the love and trust of the people. King Mosiah’s people illustrate this as “they did wax strong in love towards Mosiah; yea, they did esteem him more than any other man;”(The Book of Mormon, Mosiah 29.40). Gaining the trust of the people through actions and words is essential for all leaders. If the king was not a person you respect, why would you support them? For example, in Oedipus Rex, a plague arises distressing the city. Oedipus, with his kingly attribute, informs his people: “I have been weeping much and wandering many roads of the mind” in an attempt to think of a solution to their crisis (line 71). Oedipus sought to fill the role of a benevolent ruler. To a king, support from his people is not optional, it is essential.

Having a just king to gracefully shoulder the responsibilities and attributes listed was the ideal outcome of a monarchy. However, the maturity and abilities required to be a just king were not always fulfilled by those who were appointed to these positions, especially by the hereditary succession. Bad ruling leads to uprising and political turmoil. Tyranny is born from instability and discontent among the people. When all decisions rely on one sole leader their decisions have an immense impact on the people they lead. This impact is evident when Mosiah speaks of King Noah exclaiming: “how much iniquity doth one wicked king cause to be committed,” (Mosiah 29.17). Poor decisions by one have a great impact on many. In another case, Agamemnon rashly threatens Achilles causing internal contention among the Greeks. He claims that Achilles will see “how much stronger” he is in comparison which leads Achilles to refuse to fight for the Greeks (Homer 1.195). Undeniably, Agamemnon’s actions had a drastic effect on many lives after they lost the aid of Achilles for a period. Anger and pride lead leaders to make rash decisions that impact many innocent people.

Few can bear, with grace, the heavy burdens of responsibility of being a king. As these burdens increased the appeal of a democracy likewise increased and therefore shifted the responsibility of leadership to a wider group of people. Democracy took some of the “the trials and troubles of a righteous king,” away and ensured the will of the people was honored (Mosiah 2.33). Consequently, subjects of democratic societies experienced a system that “favours the many instead of a few” (Finley 267). The responsibility was also spread among the many rather than only a few. In brief, the enormous amount of responsibility placed upon kings led to problems when unqualified men were in the position. These problems led to members of society taking on more responsibility for society by participating in a democratic government.
Question 2: Why Strong Leaders?
Throughout time people have desired to have a single leader to look towards. The idea of democracy is appealing but comes with hindrances that can be avoided by having a kingship. Democracy eliminates most of the risk of having an unjust rule or decision made that wasn’t supported by the majority. However, the process is less efficient and can lead to division and internal conflict. The differences between the two ways of ruling led Cleon to state “a democracy is incapable of empire” (Finely 281). Regulation and unity are appealing characteristics to society due to the feeling of stability.

The search for regulation and unity is evident in the need for law. Law is an essential building block of government and provides structure and consequence. Law enforcement is a responsibility bestowed upon leaders. Oedipus affirms this role while arguing with Creon stating: “Yet, there must be rule.” (Oedipus Rex line 649). Evidently, regulating and enforcing were responsibilities given to the ruler. Similarly, King Mosiah explained, “I punished according to the crime which he has committed, according to the law,” (Mosiah 29.15). Uniformity in law enforcement and regulation gives society a sense of dependability and security. Undeniably the citizens feel safer in a predictable environment and live with less care knowing this responsibility is not on their shoulders alone. Without enforcement of the law, how would society flourish? For example, if there were no copyright or patent laws people would have no incentive to create new products or to innovate technology. Thus, the critical role of law enforcement cannot be overrated. As written in Thucydides, Cleon argued that the “present change of mind” (Finely 281) because of the democratic system would reflect upon the strength of their leadership. To be sure, Cleon recognized the importance of consistency in rule and the effect it can have on the perceived strength of the state.

In addition to regulating the law, strong leadership helps unify society. As seen in society today, multiple leaders and groups can fragment society. A strong leader unifies their people and prevents instability due to internal conflict. In the Iliad, Agamemnon and Achilles caused a division among the Greeks while they were fighting with Troy. After refusing to assist a final plea is directed toward Achilles stating: “the ships will be harder to save when they’re burning” (Homer 9.18). Fewer people would have suffered if Achilles had been united from the beginning. As we see from this example a unified society is more powerful and is more capable of protecting citizens. It typically takes longer for multiple people to make a decision than one authoritative person. More people results in more opinions and views. To conclude, establishing a consistent implementation of laws and having a society unified, as a whole, are two appeals of having a strong leader.

Unity and regulation, however, can still be found in a democracy. It is important for a democracy to have a strong leader as well. At some point a final decision needs to be made. In the system that King Mosiah created there was a chief judge. A chief judge was someone that would make the final decision concerning a case. The judge also served as a figurehead. Though not their king, they still looked toward him as their example. It is easier to look towards one person than a group. A single person is often used to signify the ideals of a group. Because of this leader’s status they have power to influence what the people support. Thus even an elected leader has power above their office.
Conclusion
Leaders in all kinds of government, including monarchies and democracies have power and influence over the culture and views of the people. This influence comes partially due to the responsibilities placed upon them and the attributes they develop. In addition, poor leadership can have profound negative consequences on the people. Even in attempts to spread out the influence among the people through means of democracy, strong leaders naturally arose as the people sought a figurehead. This desire helped bring unity, regulation, and stability to their society. The motivation for these traits are found in both democracies and kingships in both classic Greek and Book of Mormon times.
Works Cited
Finley, Moses I. The Portable Greek Historians. Penguin Books, 1977.
Homer, et al. The Essential Homer: Selections from the Iliad and the Odyssey. Hackett, 2000.
Sophocles, J E. Thomas, Paul Moliken, and Elizabeth Osborne. Oedipus Rex. , 2005. Print.
Murray, Oswyn. “kingship.” The Oxford Classical Dictionary. : Oxford University Press, , 2005. Oxford Reference. Date Accessed 18 Feb. 2020 <https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198606413.001.0001/acref-9780198606413-e-3529>.
The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ. Salt Lake City, Utah: The Church of Jesus Christ Of Latter-day Saints, 2013. Print.








